9 comments

  • zetazzed 18 minutes ago
    I'm not at all anti-AI, but I'm still holding my breath to see real scientific contributions coming from modern (LLM/CoT/agent) AI. Much of the premise behind "AI will make superabundance a reality" hinges on getting AI-driven science that affects everyday lives Anthropic's quasi-CRISPR-like discovery did not seem super compelling, and that is still the best I have seen. If anyone has more heartening stories that could convince me to be an optimist, please do share ;)
    • criemen 11 minutes ago
      Is math or theoretical Computer Science not "real science"? Whatever one may think about the process, the results are real and are coming from LLMs.
      • Lichtso 6 minutes ago
        It is.

        What I think the parent post is missing is that breakthroughs in science don't immediately translate into breakthroughs in engineering and even less so into economically viable products.

        • parineum 0 minutes ago
          I'd expect that process to be accelerated by AI more than the process of novel discovery.
      • ajkjk 4 minutes ago
        well they don't affect anyone's day-to-day lives, which is what the person you're replying to is talking about..
      • fallingbananna 3 minutes ago
        I have a feeling that many more fields are utilizing AI and having some success with it and we just don't know about it in our STEM bubble.

        On the other hand, you could downplay the math findings a bit, since it didn't further our understanding of mathematics just yet, only provided proves to things we didn't have proves for.

    • nzeid 13 minutes ago
      This post so perfectly captures the tragedy of how the term AI has lost its meaning to LLMs.
    • andy99 7 minutes ago
      There’s been a tendency since well before LLMs for AI demos to focus on “here’s a new problem we made up that it solves that you could imagine will soon transfer to an existing real problem” as opposed to “AI solves X”. This has been an ongoing challenge, it does cool stuff and looks so promising but has been very hard to harness for useful work. It’s still going to take time before the hype dies down and we see what’s left.

      I don’t think it’s going away, LLMs and other ML stuff will no doubt remain part of people’s workflow, but I also see no evidence for superabundance or anything close to it.

  • havaianaslife 1 hour ago
    I hope European university networks and their underfunded labs will join forces as soon as possible with other European national research centers.
    • sandermvanvliet 32 minutes ago
      I’d be surprised if that isn’t already the case with CERN itself already being a multi-national collaboration project and with things like GÉANT https://geant.org/ existing
  • timbaboon 33 minutes ago
    Man, when I was doing my PhD at CERN the most far out thing that we were generally allowed to use was boosted decision trees :) getting anything other than that approved for any Higgs-related analysis was… not a thing.
  • trilogic 1 hour ago
    Great news, let them cook.
  • chews 53 minutes ago
    Wonderful news to not see the duopoly accelerating real science.
  • AndrewKemendo 40 minutes ago
    This is great progress in fundamental research and I’m thrilled to see Mistral leading it.

    Makes perfect sense and I’m glad that CERN is focusing on EU providers

    • parineum 2 minutes ago
      It makes sense in a political way but I'm not sure if it's the best choice for scientific development seeing as Mistral has been pretty behind the curve it's entire existence.

      It makes more sense if they're the only company who was willing to work on a more custom solution for the proposed LHC model but I don't that a bit as it would be great PR for the frontier labs.

      This seems a lot more like an effort to bolster European AI by moving CERN money into Mistral.

  • anupj 4 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • tonyhart7 40 minutes ago
    hope we get ethical use of AI unlike OpenAI shenanigan
  • swingandamiss 39 minutes ago
    Wait, so we like AI now?
    • setopt 22 minutes ago
      AI != GPT
    • zamadatix 25 minutes ago
      Some people do, some people don't. Some it depends on what for and how it's used as well, as well as what kind.
    • sheikhnbake 30 minutes ago
      AI has been beneficial in multiple research fields across maths and science. That is to say, it's actually benefited humanity in those particular use cases.

      As opposed to enshitifying the lives of the working class in most other areas.

    • Legend2440 25 minutes ago
      I think there is a large group of commenters who actually just hate silicon valley tech companies, and they're fine with AI as long as it comes from someone else.
      • goolz 6 minutes ago
        Poetic considering the locale. But ya, modern tech is pretty gross, and I yearn for the open models.
      • kaffekaka 20 minutes ago
        1. Yes. 2. Maybe
    • x187463 30 minutes ago
      Using AI as a tool to investigate the mysteries of the universe is a huge win for humanity. Generating slop images to confuse people online is not. AI is tool, we like when tools are used for good.
    • malux85 33 minutes ago
      Maturity is understanding there's an enormous range between "like" and "dislike", between "love" and "hate", between "good" and "bad", and its also possible to be neither at once or both at once.